The R.L. Allan Reference ESV
The R. L. Allan website announces that these are "probably the finest Bibles in the world." Whoever inserted the word probably in that sentence should be nominated for the Nobel Prize for modesty. There is no question that Allan's produces the finest Bibles in the world. Allan's is the gold standard in fine binding. As far as these eyes (and fingers) are concerned, no one else comes close. During the recent Dark Age between the introduction of the English Standard Version in 2001 and the debut of Allan's Reference ESV bound in highland goatskin in the summer of 2004, I used to day dream about an Allan's-bound ESV. I would hold my Allan's KJV in Cape Levant goatskin, rubbing my hands over its cover and inhaling the wonderful scent of the leather and art-gilt pages, imagining that when I opened it the ESV would miraculously appear. (And I'm sorry to report that this is not an exaggeration. An improbable amount of my time is spent doing precisely this sort of thing.) Finally, the notice appeared on the Allan's site that an ESV was in the works. I received the latest print catalog and had the news confirmed. I remember showing the entry to Laurie. I wanted someone else to confirm that my eyes were not deceiving me. They weren't.
The best word to describe an Allan's binding is luxurious. It feels alive in your hand. I ordered my first one from a distributor in Canada, sight unseen. Inside are the guts of an Oxford blackletter KJV in the rather dated archaic setting to which the Authorized Version is so often relegated. But the cover was spectacular, unlike any I had ever seen. It far exceeded the standard of Cambridge Bibles, which until that time had been the sine qua non in my experience. Eventually, I tracked down the source, a Glasgow-based shop that keeps the tradition of fine binding alive, and started referring anyone who would listen to R. L. Allan's. This is what Bible binding ought to be, I said. It's worth it to spend a little more than you would on the cardboard catastrophes at the local Christian bookstore to get a Bible you will delight in for a lifetime.
But until the debut of the Allan's Reference ESV, I was in a quandary. On the one hand, I was extolling the virtue of Allan's bindings, but on the other I was urging people to check out the English Standard Version (warning them in advance that the bindings wouldn't measure up to their expectations). Now, I have no such qualms. The best Bible binding on the market is also the best modern translation available.
The Reference ESV is actually a little nicer than my original KJV. The cover is more flexible and the binding opens flat and displays an unparalleled limpness. Unlike Crossway's Heirloom Reference edition, the Allan's ESV is relatively trim and compact. The grain is exquisite and the imprinting stands out nicely. The cover is semi-yapp, which means the edges protrude to overlap the pages, and leather-lined. All of that is well and good, but the most important test for me is how it feels. I have Cambridge Bibles, for example, that are made of excellent materials to exacting standards but won't lay open on a table. The finest leather and paper is nothing (to me) if it doesn't deliver an aesthetically engaging experience of use.
And that's precisely where the Allan's Reference ESV shines. It is a pleasure to handle, a pleasure to use. When I open it and set it on a table, it lays perfectly flat. There is no arch to the spine, no stiffness to the cover. The Bible settles onto the tabletop with a liquid quality. The photograph demonstrates this quite well: with my hand on the spine, the sides of the Bible fall open and hang without any reluctance. It would take more adverbs than I have in my arsenal to explain what a satisfying feeling that is, especially in light of my years of frustration with so-called "premium" bindings by North American publishers.
The goal of a quality binding is not to look nice. The Bible is meant to be used, and a quality binding is designed to make that use more convenient and pleasant. I have shelves full of Bibles. In fact, I have boxes full of them thanks to the fact that the shelves have overflown. I don't imagine very many of them were designed and bound with serious use in mind. Since I have this curious obsession, I tend to look at other people's Bibles at church or in the classroom. I've seen more than a few that are in worse shape after a year or two of regular use than a fifth-century papyrus.
Obviously, if you're not going to use it, most any Bible will do. If you're going to use it, though, you want an excellent translation and a quality binding. Until recently, you had to choose between one or the other (unless you had the linguistic chops to tackle the still-radiant Authorized Version, in which case you only had to put up with abysmal typography). Now, with the Allan's Reference ESV, people who take the Bible seriously can own an uncompromising edition that will stand up to the test of regular use.
LINKS
R. L. Allan's ESV Order Page

Have you found the different spelling and vocabulary of this British edition a hinderance to your reading and study of this edition of the ESV?
Posted by:Todd France | September 25, 2007 at 08:37 AM
Not at all, Todd. In fact, I can't think of a single instance in which I've been "thrown."
Posted by:J. Mark Bertrand | September 25, 2007 at 01:49 PM
Mark, a couple questions:
1) Does this contain the ESV 2007 revision text?
2) What does the layout of the pages look like? It appears to be 2-columns -- but is it Verse-by-verse rather than in paragraphs (every verse begins a new line) ?
I am considering Crossway's ESV Single Column Reference (Black, Premium Calfskin Leather) which seems to be a great value at $122 (37% off msrp) from Amazon.com! This large fonts, verse-by-verse layout, and flat-lying sewn binding is just what I'm looking for in the perfect teaching/preaching Bible.
Allan's Reference at 85pounds (~$175 usd?) is just too expensive!!
Any insights on this would be appreciated ;-)
Posted by:Alex S. Leung | October 15, 2007 at 08:05 PM
It appears this Bible is two-column...and not wide-margin. Correct?
Posted by:PDS | October 15, 2007 at 08:41 PM
Alex, this article should answer your questions about the interior of the Allan's ESV:
http://jmarkbertrand.typepad.com/bibledesign/2007/09/inside-an-allan.html
To make a long story short, it's basically the same layout as a Crossway Classic Reference, minus the book intros and red-letter text. The only verse-per-line setting of the ESV is the Single Column Reference. I don't think it's in the same league as the Allan's ESV, but if you're looking for a larger text and the traditional verse-per-line layout, it's the only game in town.
Posted by:J. Mark Bertrand | October 15, 2007 at 08:42 PM
PDS: That's correct. It's the same inside as a Classic Reference, two columns and regular margins.
Posted by:J. Mark Bertrand | October 15, 2007 at 08:43 PM
Alex -- I have the ESV Bible you are considering. By the way, I think there is a new one on EBAY right now for $99. It is a super nice Bible -- my biggest complaint is the thickness of the paper for note-taking. If you are simply using it to read, it's fantastic...if you want to fill it up with notes etc, you may be disappointed.
Posted by:PDS | October 15, 2007 at 09:33 PM
Alex -- I have the ESV Bible you are considering. By the way, I think there is a new one on EBAY right now for $99. It is a super nice Bible -- my biggest complaint is the thickness of the paper for note-taking. If you are simply using it to read, it's fantastic...if you want to fill it up with notes etc, you may be disappointed.
Posted by:PDS | October 15, 2007 at 09:34 PM
I agree with PDS on the paper thickness for the Thinline ESV...it is too thin. It is a pretty nice binding aside from the paper issue.
Posted by:matt | October 16, 2007 at 08:49 AM
The question is which binding of Allan's do you prefer: The Tan ESV or the Black ESV???
Posted by:matt | October 16, 2007 at 08:52 AM
I have trying to nail down where Allan's gets their "Highland" goatskin from. I know that mechling binds with a "standard" goatskin and if you pay $50 dollars more you can get Harmatan goatskin with a hand finish, I wonder if the hand finish is the same as Allan's? The next time I send a bible to mechling I would like to find a cover on par with Allans.
Anyone know about leather differences between say mechling and Allans?
Posted by:matt | October 16, 2007 at 09:06 AM
Thanks for your help PDS & Mark!
I think I'll stick with Crossway's SCR premium calfskin:)
I currently have a Thinline ESV (tan/premium bonded leather) and I do a lot of underlining with pen/pencil -- and I totally agree, the paper is too thin for notetaking! I'll try to contact Crossway to see if they have plans to fix this -- cause for some, the page-thru-page bleeding of the text is bothersome.
Posted by:Alex S. Leung | October 16, 2007 at 10:54 AM
In speaking with Crossway recently, they have received numerous complaints about the paper-quality. While they didn't give me a definitive answer, it is something they are well aware of and I believe are in the process of addressing. But, in terms of what, when etc...no idea.
Posted by:PDS | October 16, 2007 at 09:43 PM
PDS, I was on the horn with Crossway just today. I had a problem with The English-Greek Reverse Interlinear New Testament that they resolved so I called Stuart or is it Stewart(?), in customer service to thank him for replacing the damaged copy I had. While conversing with Stuart I asked about the latest printing of the Single Column Reference and wether or not it was going to be reprinted using heavier paper. Crossway is currently out of stock on this particular edition and they expect delivery of new stock in December. I was informed that the printer keeps unbound book blocks of all their editions warehoused until Crossway needs more. The paper issue is something they are aware of will take into consideration in the future but first they need to exhaust the current stock on hand.
I own the Deluxe Heirloom as well as the Single Column Reference, the Heirloom used 27 lbs. paper while the SCR uses 21 lbs. The SCR is 42mm thick at the spine while the Heirloom is 45mm thick, about 1.5" for the block itself. The trim size is almost identical at @ 6.5"x9.25" with the SCR only slightly smaller. The real difference is in the page count. The Heirloom has a 1328 page count while the SCR has 1784 pages. The difference of 456 pages is equal to 11mm or a 1/2". The SCR would be a tad over 2" thick were it to use the same paper as the Heirloom.
If the complaints keep coming in, it seems that Crossway is willing to do something about it.
Posted by:Jesus Saenz | October 16, 2007 at 11:04 PM
my original Reference esv in bonded leather had something like 27ib...it was thick!!! but the quality lasted through tons of marking, and the binding fell completely apart but the pages held together perfectly.
Although the two ESVs I bought lately (cordovan Reference in calf/ thinline in calf) have horrible paper.
Posted by:matt | October 17, 2007 at 09:46 AM
I ordered the Allan's ESV in black highland goatskin last week. I spent all of that time wondering if it was really going to be worth the cost. It arrived today, and I have to say that it is more than worth it. It surpasses by far the quality of Crossway's original calfskin edition that I also own, as well as that of my Nelson Signature Bible, and my NASB single column Bible in Calfskin by Foundation Publications in quality. The smell of the leather, the art-gilt edges, the semi-yapp cover, the inside lining, and the overall feel of this Bible all cried out to me that it was money well spent. Any time I have need of a fine Bible, I now know where to turn.
Posted by:Brian | October 30, 2007 at 07:40 PM
I just received an email response from Crossway about the paper thickness issue:
http://www.sixsteps.org/2007/11/01/paper-too-thin-on-esv-bibles/
Posted by:Alex S. Leung | November 01, 2007 at 09:16 AM
I just received my black ESV today and it is beautiful. Thanks Mark for the review. I have one question for others who have ordered this one and the tan. The first pages, from Genesis 19 and back to the first or second blank page at the beginning, are stitched together so that they do not open as completely as the rest of the Bible does. It doesn't hide the text, but I was wondering if there is a reason for this, is it normal, or do I need to consider returning the Bible? Thanks for any response.
Posted by:Kyle | November 06, 2007 at 09:38 AM
Mr. Bertrand,
I want to thank you. I am also one who cannot stand the quality of today's bibles, it's quite sad. However after visiting bibles-direct.com I now have in my possession the best bible I have ever seen or handled, the Allan's reference ESV in black Highland Goatskin. This is an amazing bible, and an end to a long search for a quality bible. I have owned the heirloom reference edition of the ESV, as well as numerous Cambridge bibles, but finally a bible producer that takes great pains in making a quality bible that will stand the test of time. Thank you for the review of your Allan bible, and all the info given about it.
Posted by:Chad Smith | November 18, 2007 at 04:35 AM
How do the Allen ESVs compare with the Standard Reference Editions in Calfskin (not the thinlines). Are they of superior leather, binding, and overall construction to warrant the purchase?
Posted by:josh | January 01, 2008 at 07:48 AM
Josh - They are of superior leather and binding, and I believe warrant the extra cost. While the ESVs in calfskin are very nice, The black calfskin is very supple IMO and the cordovan has a unique look, they do not trump the beauty of the Allan's ESV. The Allans ESV also has a stronger binding, yet also a much more flexible binding.
Allans simply has a more refined look and feel. I guess that accounts for the extra $60 or so.
I would add that some have brought up issues on the blog regarding a stiff book block, etc, which happened in the most recent printing, but Allans is putting out a reprinting later this year (with the updated ESV text) which you may be interested in which is said to fix all the areas in need of attention.
Posted by:matt | January 01, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Yes, I would wait for the new Allan ESV to come out. I haven't noticed any comments about this issue -- but once one gets a Calfskin or Goatskin cover, what is the proper way to maintain and care for the Bible so it lasts a very long time???
Posted by:PDS | January 01, 2008 at 02:19 PM
1. Natural leather products like goatskin and calfskin are supposed to be handled regularly so the oil from your hands can "condition" the leather...I have heard stories of quality bindings not lasting very long because they are purchased and then shelved for years.
2. I would stay away from leather cleaning products because all the ones I have used either add a smell or slightly darken the leather, plus I dont think they work all that well for bibles. A damp cloth should be sufficient on most bibles.
3.dont be like me and set a bible down on a counter were a chemical was recently spilled thats a sure way to strip the color and finish off.
Posted by:matt | January 01, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Good info. Thanks Matt -- anyone else???
Posted by:PDS | January 01, 2008 at 06:04 PM
this seem to be an outstanding bible, what Allan KJV would be most like this one? in comparison.... ?
Posted by:Christian | January 04, 2008 at 06:24 AM