The Books of the Bible (TNIV)

The Books of the Bible is a fascinating project from International Bible Society, a new approach both to the design and organization of the biblical text. The emphasis is on better Bible reading. To that end, the designers have made a series of intriguing choices. Here's a run-down from the project's site:

* chapter and verse numbers are removed from the text (a chapter-and-verse range is at the bottom of each page)

* individual books are presented with the literary divisions that their authors have indicated

* footnotes, section headings and other supplementary materials have been removed from the text (translators’ notes are available at the back of each book)

* the books of the Bible have been placed in an order that provides more help in understanding, based on literary genre, historical circumstance and theological tradition

* single books that later translations or tradition divided into two or more books are made whole again
(example: Luke-Acts)

* single-column setting that clearly and naturally presents the literary forms of the Bible’s books

The project is styled as a "presentation" of the Bible, highlighting the novelty of the approach. The Books of the Bible is meant to encourage a new way of seeing. Instead of focusing on the verse or the chapter, the emphasis is on whole books. This is music to my ears, and it's no surprise that since this project debuted, I've been getting lots of e-mails asking, "What do you think?"

After spending some time with the Books of the Bible, I'm ready to answer.

WHAT I LIKE
Conceptually, I love what I see. The thinking behind the formatting and organizational choices is made explicit on the Books of the Bible site, and I appreciate the way it's positioned. This isn't a Bible to replace all others. Instead, it's a new way of approaching the text, stripping away some of the additions that have built up over time. A lot of people -- myself included -- complain about proof-texting and the tendency to read Scripture through a microscope, importing significance to the subtext and letting the text go unnoticed. But here's an effort to do something about that. I admire the courage it takes to say, "Here. This is how the book is meant to be read."

When I taught through the Pauline epistles chapter-by-chapter, I organized the books chronologically instead of following the traditional line-up. So the way the Books of the Bible re-arranges the material makes sense to me. Combining Luke and Acts? Great idea. The new sequence works, and for those of us familiar with the traditional order, it shakes up our set notions sufficiently to provoke a "second look" at what we thought we already knew. Dividing the Old Testament into Covenant History, Prophets, and Writings makes a similar sense.

I don't want to exaggerate the gains these changes provide. Traditionally-formatted Bibles -- even the old double-column, verse-per-line, self-pronouncing ones -- are far from unreadable. You won't open The Books of the Bible and be astonished. Typography and format are subtle influences, so the sea change is moderate, in some cases imperceptible.

The biggest shift, for readers already familiar with the Bible, is the removal of chapter and verse markers. No, I wouldn't want this to become standard. We rely on these tools to much to abandon them. But spend some time with The Books of the Bible trying to locate familiar passages and you'll find it isn't too difficult. In fact, I found myself doing something interesting -- something I suspect would please the folks at IBS immensely. Instead of hunting for passages using numeric tools, I had to rely on the logic of the passage.

To locate the stirring conclusion of Romans 8, for example, I had to flip through the book, read a few lines, and recall the structure of the argument in my mind to determine if I'd landed before or after the "verses" I was looking for. "Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus"? Before. "It is not as though God's word had failed. For not all who are descendants from Israel are Israel"? That's the aftermath of what I'm looking for, the stillness after the rhetorical storm. To find the passage I wanted -- "No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us" -- I needed a new intellectual grid based not on number but ideas. I had to navigate the Bible the way I would another book, by knowing the content, not the references. Now that really could change the way you view Scripture. (There are chapter and verse ranges given at the bottom of each page, too, so finding an unfamiliar passage in a hurry isn't as hard as you might think.)

I find the format useful and challenging. With the same challenge to meet, I might have made different choices, but The Books of the Bible impresses me as a concept that's been thought through from the ground up. The decisions make sense.

The form of the book is pleasing, too. It's a glued binding on inexpensive paper, and there's a distracting amount of bleed-through, but this is a $9 paperback, after all. It opens flat and has a good heft. It measures 6 x 9 and it's a little over 1.5 inches thick. A handful, yes, and since the cover offers no rigidity, it can be more than a handful when you're stretched out on the couch trying to read. The size is a trade-off that earns you comfortably-sized type.

WHAT I DON'T LIKE
You knew this was coming, didn't you? As much as I like the concept behind The Books of the Bible, there are a few things I really wish they'd done differently. They're minor enough to go unnoticed by a lot of people, so I don't think they destroy the project or anything melodramatic like that. But they prevent this from being the "go-to" edition when I want to approach Scripture as a reader.

It all comes down to type. As I said, the type size is generous. But the type choice is egregious. The biblical text is set in a somewhat scripty font, with little calligraphic serifs. Maybe egregious is too strong a word. Using a cursive type would be egregious. This is just ... mildly disappointing. The book introductions (pictured at right) appear to be set in Garamond, and they look quite nice apart from the HTML-ish double-spacing between paragraphs. I wish they'd chosen to use the same type for the text -- or flip-flopped the two. As it is, the typographer in me can't help grinding his teeth a bit.

Another unfortunate drawback is the lack of margin near the spine. As you can see in the photograph above, the inside edges of the text disappear into the gutter. This is a common problem, but alleviating it would also solve an issue with the single-column text setting -- namely, that it's a bit too wide. On a 6 x 9 page, a comfortable width of a single column of text is about 4.5 inches. I measured a sampling of 6 x 9 trade paperbacks and found that to be roughly standard. The Books of the Bible stretches its column to 5 inches. In a context where readability is the goal, a lack of proportion on such a fundamental level is a real disappointment. There are always trade-offs in design, but in this case I think I'd have settled for a thicker book with a layout better proportioned to the page.

BIBLES FOR READING
Having said that, I hope you won't let the shortcomings outweigh the benefits. One of my passions is to see more Bibles for reading rather than reference, and The Books of the Bible is clearly a great example. It's bold in conception and stumbles slightly in execution, but overall, I am pleased with what I see. This is a Bible designed to introduce new readers to Scripture, and to teach those already familiar with it a new way of reading. I hope what the IBS has done here will serve as an example to others. If we really are dissatisfied with the way Scripture has been read (and not read) in the past, we have to do more about it than simply lament. The Books of the Bible shows that format and design -- often dismissed as aesthetic irrelevance -- have a contribution to make in the quest.

LINKS
The Books of the Bible Site

Comments

[David Dewey]

Why do we assume that the best way to get the Bible's big picture is to read it in any printed format at all? For most of history, more people have been listening to the Bible than reading it. And the best translations are often those prepared with the listener in mind (This is probably what was meant by the KJV frontispiece 'Appointed to be read in churches'.)With the advent of mp3 players, it is easy and affordable to have a listening Bible. I would encourage people to consider a mp3-format Bible as an alternative to 'The Books of the Bible'. The TNIV dramatised 'Bible Experience' (now with OT as well as NT), is excellent. Other options are the ESV 'Listener's Bible' (Max McClean) or the NLT 'Holy Santuary'. Easy and light to carry too!

[Doug Rutter]

I love the idea of this Bible. Now I hope they produce one in a version I don't find personally reprehensible...

Do you hear my Crossway?

[John]

I must admit, I would much rather read this font than that stupid looking non-serif font that has plagued the majority of TNIV printings.

[John]

I didn't look close enough. That is the stupid font. What a waste of trees.

[BLDavis]

It's not of major importance but what about the cover color? Is the Sage color more on the greenish side or the grayish side?

[Brandon]

Can someone tell me what the major difference is between this and F. LaGard Smith's chronological Bible?

[J. Mark Bertrand]

David -- I'll have to post something about audio recordings of the Bible. After hearing Kenneth Branagh's reading of Samual Pepys' Diary, I really wish he'd do one of the KJV. I'm not a big fan of dramatized readings with S/FX and everything, and I've never really warmed to the way Max McLean reads, which seems a bit portentious. In a word, I'm hard to satisfy on the audio front, just like I am in print! But your point is well taken. Audio Bibles are a great resource, especially in our iPod-toting age.

John -- I made the same discovery you did after writing the review. The font seems to be something IBS inherited from TNIV design in general. Too bad.

BL -- The sage is definitely pale green rather than gray.

Brandon -- I'm sorry, but I'm not familiar with the work you mentioned. If it's a chronological Bible, then I'd say this is very much in that spirit, though the particulars no doubt vary.

[Lowell]

Great review. I have had my copy for about two months and have enjoyed the ease of reading provided by the new layout. I am a fan of the single column setting and in the past have bought a few different translations in this format. I also prefer a clean design with as few headings, footnotes, and marginal notes as possible. With its removal of chapter and verse numbers, this new effort from IBS meets my desire for a bible where the text is pre-eminent and the distractions are kept to a minimum. I agree with you that the printing suffers from excessive bleed-through and that the margins are too narrow, but I am puzzled by your dislike of the type. When I first saw this style of type in a TNIV by Zondervan, I thought it was a great choice. To my eye it is a very clean, modern style with a minimum of distracting elements. I find it to be refreshing and easy to read. I am interested in hearing what elements of the type you dislike.
Thanks for your thoughts.

[David]

I too am very fussy about who reads an audio bible. I have the Max McLean ones (KJV,NIV,ESV) but I don't really like them. Stephen Johnson is my least favorite who also happens to do the most versions.
(ESV,KJV,NKJV,NLT,NASB)

The only voice I ever really liked reading the bible was Mike Kellogg unfortunately he only has done the NLT.

Samples here.
http://www.laridiansales.com/order/audio/ipodnltgenesis1.mp3
http://www.laridiansales.com/order/audio/ipodnltpsalm24.mp3
http://www.laridiansales.com/order/audio/ipodnltjohn3.mp3

http://www.biblebible.com/order/audio/NLT-MP3-Romans-10.mp3

I also quite enjoyed Johnny Cash Reading the NKJV New Testament.

Some people Like James Earl Jones reading the KJV New Testament.

I am always on the Lookout for a quality Audio bible though.

I doubt I will ever find the "Allan" of audio bibles.

[threegirldad]

David,

This gets my vote for "Allan" of audio bibles:

http://www.bible-media.com/

It is freely available online in Real Audio format:

http://www.audio-bible.com/bible/bible.html

[Brad]

A bit of a technicality to be sure, but hopefully a helpful one nevertheless: Luke-Acts wasn't (and isn't) a "single book" that "translations or tradition divided." While I appreciate TBoTB's placing them sequentially, they aren't perhaps the best example of that particular bullet point.

[John Newell]

I ordered some of these recently and although I am very tolerant of "bleedthough" issues, the copies I got display this problem to the extent that you can almost read the text on the other side of the page. It makes what should be an unusually easy reading experience very difficult. I think it'd be better to increase the price a bit and use better paper for what is a great concept.

[James Cartiin]

Can you help me find a copy of the Books of the Bible leather bound?

[Kimble Dement]

I'd like to offer several observations and questions - a little give and take.

First, the review of TBoB expresses my personal feelings very well. I have owned one for over a year, and I like it very much. After the initial rush of enthusiasm, however, I confess that I am far more impressed by the vision than I am the execution. The grouping of thoughts not only facilitates, but in some instances alters prior understanding. But the page lay-out renders reading more difficult than you might imagine. The text is distractingly close to the gutter, causing lines to curve into shadows. The comment about line-length is especially valid. I often read aloud for my wife and myself. The lines are fatiguingly long and do not facilitate easy reading. The lack of decent margins is a serious deterrent to note-inscribing. Inspired concept; careless execution.

I do like TBoB well enough to have asked the publisher if it is available in a hard-bound edition. I was told that the paperback is the only current edition, but my suggestion would be passed on to the product development department. So, if you want a Bible unencumbered by verse and chapter numbers, this is the only option of which I am aware.

To answer another poster - TBoB is nothing like F. Lagard Smith's edition of the Bible. TBoB preserves all of the books as discreet entities.

My question: Ideally I would like a text-only, single-column, wide-margin, red-letter, quality, preferably NASB, ESV, NKJV or TNIV. Can anybody help me?

[bill]

For those of you bothered about the text disappearing into the gutter, try breaking in the binding a lot harder than you might feel comfortable with. I have found the glued binding particularly tough. Don't break it back all at once, but gradually going from front to back, 50 pages at a time, force it open more and more. The black and orange are only $6 each so what are you worried about? After about an hour of man-handling, you'll be surprised to just what degree of Bible yoga you can achieve with this glued-only binding. Makes it considerably easier to read.

I have the orange model (the color grows on you) and I've found a nice coat of carnauba wax makes the cover feel nicer to the touch and it resists soiling.