"Once the artistic element has been separated out from any area of human activity, whatever remains risks being devalued as mechanical and even contemptible. Once religious paintings were made into works of art, then any church decoration that did not bear the mark of a master was of little interest; any building not designed by a known architect was 'vernacular'; any anonymous folk song might be charming but could only become real art when arranged by a serious composer. Low art disappeared below the horizon of history until its rediscovery by social (but not art) historians.
"This legacy has not simply divided 'low art' from 'high art', but has decreased the possibility of artistic achievement in everyday life. Once the decoration of churches or the painting of icons on the design of cathedrals and guild-halls was taken out of the hands of wood-carvers and masons and journeymen and given to artists, then the role of the artisan was decisively degraded. Artisans may take pride in their work but they must know that it is always somehow second-rate. When the artist is removed from society and made into a special person, then the artist within each of us begins to die."
Good quote. Thanks for sharing. I heartily agree. It's impossible to separate the artistic life from the rest of life. How does it not flow with my everyday activities, my theology (itself flowing with everyday activities), my relationships, my dreams (in every sense), etc?
Also, shouldn't our goal to be creating beautiful things, whether they're "commercial" (or genre) or literary, whether pop music or classical, whether graphic arts or a piece for a gallery?
Posted by: Heather | December 15, 2008 at 11:43 AM